There are urgent matters to attend to

Filling the pail


I was quite happy to post Mike Ollerton’s critique of Cognitive Load Theory. I disagree with it, but I like they way it has implications for teaching and learning. As a teacher, that is what I am interested in. I would like to propose a test for educational ideas.

  1. Does the idea have implications for what we teach?
  2. Does the idea have implications for how we teach?

If the answer is, “No”, to both of these questions then it still may be a very interesting idea, but it is not of practical significance to teachers; the primary concern of this blog.

Let’s explore the difference these questions make. While Ollerton suggests that it is possible to learn through problem solving, I would suggest that such an approach is more likely to fail and that this likelihood increases for the most disadvantaged students. Ollerton may, if he wishes, support his position…

View original post 738 more words

Advertisements

About teachingbattleground

I teach
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s