A traditionalist case against setting/for mixed ability grouping (at least in subjects which are cumulative as opposed to hierarchical)

Lee Donaghy

This paper, by Professor Becky Francis and her research team at the IOE, which described setting of pupils in English schools as being a form of ‘symbolic violence’ against those who find themselves in the bottom sets, has provoked much discussion on my edu-Twitter timeline. I like to think, despite inevitable cognitive biases, that I follow a good range of people across the great Prog-Trad divide and so get a relatively balanced picture of discussions and debates when they arise.

From what I have seen, views on the paper have conformed broadly to type: those who I would characterise as progressives leapt on the paper’s conclusions, using it as further evidence of the inequity of ability setting and arguing for the virtues of mixed ability teaching; those of a more traditionalist bent, broadly supportive of ability grouping across the curriculum, have questioned the use of the hyperbolic phrase ‘symbolic violence’…

View original post 984 more words


About teachingbattleground

I teach
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s