Work Scrutinies Don’t Work

stealingbiscuitsiswrong?

I had the good fortune this week of being involved in an eye opening work scrutiny that really made me question the validity and purpose of such a practice.

My lightbulb moment occurred as I was looking through a particular colleague’s English books. Inside said books I witnessed some fantastic teaching that was undoubtedly built on some fantastic feedback. However, the problem was that there was no evidence of any marking or feedback in the actual books.

Now marking and feedback are two very separate entities, as outlined by Michael Tidd
Here. Previously, marking was an arduous and laborious task that mostly involved teachers sitting for hours on end writing in students’ books with a plethora of multi-coloured pens and then setting a range of differentiated follow-up tasks, whilst also scribbling a series of grades and numbers on a page that were largely meaningless, but frustratingly the only thing students…

View original post 1,110 more words

Advertisements

About teachingbattleground

I teach
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s