Are most classic theories on education fundamentally flawed? Meet the Puer Educatione

From experience to meaning...

I have been working on a scientific paper for 2 years now, but I just can’t seem to finish it. Not because it is such a difficult thing to write, but because… well I have been very busy lately getting my PhD, writing books and teaching. Still I wanted to share the basic idea behind my paper and invite people to the discussion as if I’m correct most classic theories on education are maybe fundamentally flawed and this flaw could explain the gap between science and practice often felt in education.

Ok, big gasp. What?

Let me first introduce you to the Homo Economicus or the economic man. Wikipedia defines this as

the concept in many economic theories portraying humans as consistently rational and narrowly self-interested agents who usually pursue their subjectively-defined ends optimally.

But are most people consistently rational and narrowly self-interested? Researchers such as Kahneman, Tversky and Thaler…

View original post 528 more words

Advertisements

About teachingbattleground

I teach
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

w

Connecting to %s