Does memorisation get in the way of learning? – Part 4

...to the real.

Previously I started to look at the main points in Ben Orlin’s article expressing concern that ‘memorisation might get in the way of learning:

  • Some things are worth memorising, but others are not.
  • Knowledge matters – “even a head full of memorized facts is better than an empty one.”
  • Raw rehearsal is a memorisation technique, but not a very effective one.
  • Mnemonics are a better memorisation technique, but they still promote the memorisation of meaningless facts.
  • ‘Repeated use’ is a better route to memorisation, and one that he advocates.
  • ‘Building on already known facts’ is a second route to memorisation that he strongly advocates.

I started by arguing that memorisation is learning.  Remember the quote from Kirschner et al.’s paper: “If nothing has changed in long-term memory, nothing has been learned.”

Given then that some teachers express concerns about memorisation that are valid, I next looked…

View original post 2,088 more words

Advertisements

About Kris Boulton

Teach First 2011 maths teacher, focussed on curriculum design.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s