Yesterday I said that these were the main points in Ben Orlin’s article expressing concern that ‘memorisation might get in the way of learning’:
- Some things are worth memorising, but others are not.
- Knowledge matters – “even a head full of memorized facts is better than an empty one.”
- Raw rehearsal is a memorisation technique, but not a very effective one.
- Mnemonics are a better memorisation technique, but they still promote the memorisation of meaningless facts.
- ‘Repeated use’ is a better route to memorisation, and one that he advocates.
- ‘Building on already known facts’ is a second route to memorisation that he strongly advocates.
I started by arguing that memorisation is learning. Remember the quote from Kirschner et al.’s paper: “If nothing has changed in long-term memory, nothing has been learned.”
Given then that some teachers express concerns regarding memorisation that are completely valid, I next looked at the…
View original post 2,051 more words