Does memorisation get in the way of learning? – Part 2

...to the real.

Inflexible knowledge is a necessary first step towards understanding.

Following on from my previous post, I’d like to take a look at this post by Ben Orlin, and use it as a lens to focus the discussion.  Orlin echoes, I think, the sentiments of many a teacher out there, so this should serve as a good opportunity to discuss many of the common worries around memorisation in education, as well as some misconceptions about how memory works.

First, just to be clear, Orlin defines memorisation as ‘learning an isolated fact through deliberate effort.’  This is quite different from the way I used the word in my previous post.  I’m not sure whether I would personally agree with that definition, and I won’t be able to stick to it here because I want to be able to talk about the idea of knowledge being ‘memorised’ to refer to the state of…

View original post 1,757 more words

Advertisements

About Kris Boulton

Teach First 2011 maths teacher, focussed on curriculum design.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Does memorisation get in the way of learning? – Part 2

  1. Pingback: Blogs for the Week Ending 1st November 2013 | The Echo Chamber

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s