It’s not “scientific evidence-based policy” until….

Laura McInerney

A super blog by Jack Hassard describing yet-another-think-tank-report on Science Education, points out that if anyone in an argument says “all the scientific research shows” then it is worth ensuring that what they are pointing to really hits the standard they are claiming.

This is not a new point, but what Hassard does give is a handy “Is this scientific?” checklist based on the criteria supported by the American Education Research Association.

To be considered ‘credible & valid’ education research should include:

  1. The development of a logical, evidence-based chain of reasoning;
  2. Methods appropriate to the questions posed;
  3. Observational or experimental designs and instruments that provide reliable and generalizable findings;
  4. Data and analysis adequate to support findings;
  5. Description of procedures and results clearly and in detail, including specification of the population to which the findings can be generalized;
  6. Adherence to professional norms of peer review;
  7. Dissemination of findings to contribute to…

View original post 131 more words

About teachingbattleground

I teach
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s